Wie um Himmels Willen ist es eigentlich möglich, dass wir Moskau nur dabei zuschauen, wie sie unsere Demokratie untergraben und de facto nichts tun, um dem ein Ende zu bereiten? Ich begreife es nicht. Es geht nicht in meinen Kopf.

Wir wissen genau, wie die Strukturen sind und was Russland tut/plant - von der Ostsee über Netzwerke in ganz Europa - und es passiert nichts! Das ist komplett irre.

Gibt es für so ein Verhalten in der Geschichte überhaupt einen Präzedenzfall?

Bitte tut es endlich! Der komplette Mangel an ernsthaften Konsequenzen für Feinde unserer demokratischen Gemeinschaft macht mich langsam echt fertig.

Und was glaubst du kommt dann?

That’s weird, I haven’t mentioned solar at all.

This is legit some of the most braindead shit I have read in my entire life.

From the start of this thread I’ve been saying that nuclear has no substantial benefit over renewable energy while being more expensive, more rigid and excruciatingly slower to build.

The difference in 2gCO2/kwh is meaningless and even then nuclear is still getting undercut by wind. Cope harder.

The movie Dark Waters should be watched by everyone. It’s almost a horror movie.

https://www.carbonbrief.org/solar-wind-nuclear-amazingly-low-carbon-footprints/

All of these points are true for nuclear as well, plus it’s more expensive.

Nuclear being less efficient and more expensive than renewables is not an opinion.

Ah yes “common sense”, the go to argument from everyone ranging from people who want to throw out migrants to nuclear shills.

After all, why wouldn’t we burn billions on a technology that is less efficient per kw/h, takes decades longer to build, doesn’t scale, has a worse LCOE than renewables and leaves us with toxic forever waste? It’s just common sense bro.

Still (way) more expensive than just building cheap renewables.

Lemmy seems 100% astroturfed by pro-nuclear lobbyists.

Geil, freu mich schon drauf wie wieder absolut nichts passieren wird.

We need to modernize and further integrate the European grid anyway.

The LCOE for nuclear is substantially higher than wind and solar. It’s not just upfront costs.

Can someone fill me in on why this website is so insanely pro nuclear energy?

Like, I’m not even fundamentally against it but I don’t understand why we should invest billions in a tech that has essentially been leapfrogged already, would take a decade to become relevant again and is more expensive per KW/h than both renewables and fossil fuels.

Yet every comment criticizing nuclear on Lemmy always (literally every time) gets buried in downvotes. It’s super weird.

I’d be interested in the economics of building an artificial hydroelectric storage facility over those of building and running a mine for storing nuclear waste.

Germany is not the only country that’s having problems with permanent waste storage. Most countries have not even started dealing with this issue and are still using interim storage solutions.

Not really, you can build hydroelectric storage facilities.

The nuclear storage facilities here in Germany are already being shut down because they’re in danger of leaking into the groundwater.

You said “it’s much safer” in your original comment, which you removed in the edit.

The source you’ve linked shows it’s marginally safer on a death per KW/h rate, true, while being substantially more expensive and comes with the unsolved problem of dealing with toxic waste.